Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C75
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200525
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '20 at 18:33
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 517 8-Core 804 82% 660 Pts	64-Core 1,036 64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77% Very good	Lighting 96.6 Reflection 86.6 Parallax 83.7 79% 88.9 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 80.5 Splatting 77.2 74% 92.3 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 287 282 233 236 237 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 490 Write 353 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 268 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 36.2 120% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 196 174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 103%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 225GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 467 468 444 389 389 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 453 Mixed 288 SusWrite 434 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 45.1 142% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 292 237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 125%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 356GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 91 Write 31 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 125 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 31.1 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 44.2 SC Mixed 28.9 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	863x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	582x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	554x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	705x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	700x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	350x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $941

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16