Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 18:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 161
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 444
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 485
33% 485 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$255
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
41.5% Average
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
37% 142 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 142
42% 142 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 1489 1464 1292 1306 1337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,488
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 1,384
321% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 44.1
145% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 442
378% 559 MB/s
Poor: 238%
This bench: 220%
Great: 361%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 133 123 132 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 163
Mixed 114
SusWrite 129
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
277% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3007 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 28.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 17.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,027
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $544SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback