| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 18 '20 at 14:55 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.4%
Excellent
|
81% 146 Pts
|
71% 563 Pts
|
40% 652 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
19% 26 fps
|
18% 21.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 466 466 474 418 363 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
104% 462 MB/s
|
176% 60.1 MB/s
|
52% 71.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
89% 31.1 GB/s
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
50% 80.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 314 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 44x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 39x |
| Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $101Bench 68%, 93,718 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $162 |