Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 06:01
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-950-$279
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 149
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 374
39% 306 Pts
64-Core 372
25% 372 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 64.1
57% 69.7 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 67.9
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$205
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 175 201 207 206 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 330
Write 206
Mixed 216
SusWrite 190
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 30.1
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 38.3
32% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 122%
Kingston A400 120GB-$23
112GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 93 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 242
Write 128
Mixed 193
SusWrite 93.5
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 31.7
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 38.9
34% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
119GB free
Firmware: V5DOA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 37.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 39.1
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 36%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$80
396GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 93 97 99 98 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 119
Write 128
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 93.7
65% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$80
343GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 123 125 126 127 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 124
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
131GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 49 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 105
Write 95.7
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 52.4
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
123GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 42
Write 50.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 52.3
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 47%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$106
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 60 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 125
Write 110
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 58.6
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 60 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 58.6
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 4,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback