Biostar TA75A+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardBiostar TA75A+  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 102
48% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 99.2
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 102
7% 102 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 376C) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1428 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 20.9
5% 19.4 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 19.5
5% 17.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$30
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 29 53 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 76
Mixed 20
SusWrite 42.6
34% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TA75A+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar TA75A+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $544SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback