PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100706 |
Uptime | 30.9 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '20 at 23:31 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 74% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
60%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 104 105 108 106 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
85GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 101 101 101 98 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
918GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 26 27 27 28 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 53x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 52x |
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $128 |