Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '20 at 23:25
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	PRY-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 219 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 429 57% 428 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.5% Above average	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 74.1 Parallax 71.8 60% 73.3 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 55.5 52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 179 105 34 128 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 324 Write 145 Mixed 215 SusWrite 102 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 22.8 79% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 95.3 81% 118 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 153GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 126 125 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 160 Write 153 Mixed 78 SusWrite 124 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 22.3 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 23.3 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,864x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	863x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	188x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	459x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	391x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	356x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	510x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	238x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	200x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	496x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	165x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16