PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte A320M-S2H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191128 |
Uptime | 10 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '20 at 22:01 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 147 140 150 165 169 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
372GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 173 175 175 176 176 MB/s
|
98.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
49GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8 14 13 14 14 MB/s
|
9.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A5244BB0-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
22.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 811x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 776x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 740x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 771x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 446x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 409x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $391 |