Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 433
52% 398 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 18.8
16% 17.9 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 21.1
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 157 162 163 179 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 288
Write 264
Mixed 235
SusWrite 160
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 35.5
109% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 202
150% 198 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
44GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 162 169 178 191 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 343
Write 294
Mixed 286
SusWrite 169
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 43
136% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 224
169% 228 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
74GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 325 339 348 385 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 371
Mixed 313
SusWrite 333
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 40.1
118% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 304
241% 336 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
70GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 333 349 357 396 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 422
Mixed 384
SusWrite 342
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 49.6
170% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
169GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 104 102 100 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 93
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 101
54% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F2G64CB88G4N-DI 859B BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 830B M2F2G64CB88G4N-DI 859B BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback