Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 15:33
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 159
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 488
45% 376 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Asus(1043 86EA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 84.1
Parallax 78.3
76% 85.4 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 75.6
61% 74.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 190 169 171 138 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 343
Write 219
Mixed 208
SusWrite 166
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 18.6
68% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 219
189% 280 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
542GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 156 154 155 156 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 102
Write 76.4
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 154
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
536GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 150 151 152 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 151
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 13.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback