Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 14:39
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 435
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 137
Parallax 116
99% 125 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 129
Splatting 106
90% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 333 449 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 458
Mixed 420
SusWrite 400
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 49.2
161% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 219
171% 237 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
795GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 359 450 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 459
Mixed 428
SusWrite 404
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 51.5
170% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 231
173% 234 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
XPG GAMMIX S5 1TB
690GB free
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 451 582 592 593 593 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,161
Write 590
Mixed 661
SusWrite 514
162% 731 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 40.4
145% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 429
300% 369 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 138%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback