Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 27.3 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 57.5 25% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 53.4 8-Core 55.2 7% 54.3 Pts	64-Core 48.5 3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 1192) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.9.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 3.09 0% 2.53 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1014 256GB 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 160 188 186 194 196 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 378 Write 258 Mixed 225 SusWrite 186 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 22.4 79% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 118 94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-4 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1200, 1200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	147x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	67x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	65x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	15x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	60x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3A1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 552 samples	29x
ACR24D4S7S8MB-4 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBKingstonBench 24%, 319 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16