HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 07:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 608
67% 529 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.2% Above average
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 54.2
62% 66.7 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 61.7
51% 62.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 399 323 321 302 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 596
Mixed 689
SusWrite 331
136% 607 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 42.5
140% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 415
341% 487 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 164%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
495GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 135 135 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 140
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 135
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 97 97 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 67.9
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 97.1
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback