PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130912 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '20 at 00:07 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1762 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 81 91 91 89 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
428GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 130 133 128 130 MB/s
|
76.1%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
343GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 81 91 91 89 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
29.7%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 165x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 115x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 104x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 67x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 52x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $431 |