Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory43 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 15:17
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 63.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 176
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 759
67% 571 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 80.8
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 79.8
66% 78.9 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 75
Splatting 57
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32A0T54B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1699 1706 1729 1049 868 869 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2103
Write 404
Mixed 628
SusWrite 1320
245% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 18
102% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 568
516% 769 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 233%
Great: 311%
OCZ INTREPID 3700 960GB
661GB free
Firmware: 1.5.1.0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 411 407 413 375 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 297
Write 406
Mixed 275
SusWrite 405
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 39.6
143% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 54GB
31GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 13 20 71 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20% Very poor
Read 169
Write 156
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 33.9
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.2
41% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 5.9
DQ Mixed 1
2% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 20%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 26.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 24 21 16 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 239
Write 23.2
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 20.3
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.3
332% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 30
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback