Sony SVD13211SAW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemSony SVD13211SAW  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130517
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 08:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 112
58% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 168
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 159
11% 159 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90B1) 929MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3131
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 5.22
3% 5.06 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.87
2% 5.14 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTD128HAGM-00000 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT2300Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 3,712
Write 34
Mixed 61.5
264% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 674
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.2
1,027% 227 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback