Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '20 at 00:15
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$102 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 127 2-Core 243 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 668 65% 532 Pts	64-Core 676 42% 676 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics 47,368 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 20.2 Parallax 31.8 20% 25.3 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 24.1 18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 404 406 411 420 418 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 402 Mixed 384 SusWrite 408 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 27.6 136% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 37 92% 190 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 98%
SHGP31-500GM-2 500GB 2,984 User benchmarks, average bench 300% 466GB free Firmware: 41060C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2203 2269 876 870 893 877 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	304% Outstanding	Read 2,696 Write 1,940 Mixed 1,796 SusWrite 1,331 433% 1,941 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 81.7 268% 92.2 MB/s	DQ Read 767 DQ Write 646 DQ Mixed 692 522% 702 MB/s
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 304% Great: 370%
Gigabyte GP-AG4500G 500GB 3,596 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 466GB free Firmware: EGFM11.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2319 2344 2343 2342 2342 2342 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	328% Outstanding	Read 1,835 Write 1,664 Mixed 1,734 SusWrite 2,339 428% 1,893 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 71.9 244% 88.5 MB/s	DQ Read 831 DQ Write 792 DQ Mixed 808 608% 811 MB/s
Poor: 170% ↑ This bench: 328% Great: 370%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 2x8GB 2,724 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 31.9 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 42.6 SC Mixed 29.9 94% 33 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16