Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 898
94% 752 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2109 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.7% Good
Lighting 85.1
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 74.6
69% 82 fps
MRender 76.2
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 79.7
64% 78.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 528 537 543 540 545 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,855
Write 1,207
Mixed 646
SusWrite 602
238% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 93.8
277% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 377
464% 829 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 246%
Great: 293%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
113GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 207 180 190 183 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 489
Mixed 269
SusWrite 196
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 52.8
187% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 249
212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
751GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 141 140 139 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 150
Write 141
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 140
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
668GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 150 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 153
Write 148
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 150
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 34.3
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 32
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback