Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '20 at 01:01
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 96 1-Core 160 2-Core 313 104% 190 Pts	4-Core 636 8-Core 1,137 107% 887 Pts	64-Core 1,614 100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.4% Poor	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 23 Parallax 23.7 25% 25.9 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 31.1 Splatting 30.2 26% 32 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 245GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1064 804 786 785 788 774 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 2,595 Write 2,357 Mixed 1,841 SusWrite 833 426% 1,907 MB/s	4K Read 61.8 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 81 265% 90.1 MB/s	DQ Read 745 DQ Write 625 DQ Mixed 726 532% 699 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 355%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 73GB free Firmware: 5.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 135 136 138 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 418 Write 137 Mixed 195 SusWrite 135 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 38.8 142% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 121 97% 137 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 83%
MS Card 4GB 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.06% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 9.5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 9.4 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 2,309 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 30.2 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 44.9 SC Mixed 31 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 53.9 74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	38x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	23x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	25x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	11x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	9x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,061

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16