Performance Results


Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 160% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '20 at 23:37
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900X-$590 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 77.4 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1,131 101% 853 Pts	64-Core 1,872 116% 1,872 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	156% Outstanding	Lighting 213 Reflection 229 Parallax 221 174% 221 fps	MRender 264 Gravity 214 Splatting 141 162% 207 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00007 1TB 2,588 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 888GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7102Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1008 1033 1388 1387 1498 1482 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	306% Outstanding	Read 2,204 Write 1,859 Mixed 1,689 SusWrite 1,299 395% 1,763 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 89.1 277% 97 MB/s	DQ Read 1,296 DQ Write 1,002 DQ Mixed 1,128 850% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 306% Great: 371%
WDC PC S N720 SDAPNTW-512 512GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 200GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 265 349 343 385 377 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 380 Write 396 Mixed 370 SusWrite 333 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 39.6 129% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 243 183% 247 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 192 185 190 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 195 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 181 106% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 4x8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 49 MC Mixed 28.5 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 9.6 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 131%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 143%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
Samsung SSD 980 500GBNvmeBench 226%, 1,856 samples	8x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GBKingstonBench 85%, 37 samples	42x
ACR26D4U9D8ME-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 83%, 184 samples	7x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 4x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 118 samples	3x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $1,121

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16