Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FB
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190828
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '20 at 23:16
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 66.1 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 190 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 440 49% 388 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 119F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.73% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 7.22 5% 7.86 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 14.2 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB 1,750 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT22H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 152 153 152 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 367 Write 156 Mixed 176 SusWrite 151 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 60.6 4K Mixed 14.9 70% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 171 150% 231 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 133 133 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 131 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 2,923 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.5 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 23.3 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	122x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	30x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	15x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	117x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	50x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	23x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	19x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	13x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	66x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	33x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16