Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 82.5 1-Core 119 2-Core 234 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 706 70% 570 Pts	64-Core 832 52% 832 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 842D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8189 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.77 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 6.38 5% 11.1 fps	MRender 9.29 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 12.2 8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEMKF256G8H 256GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,803 Write 904 Mixed 702 249% 1,136 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 54.5 179% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 703 DQ Write 724 DQ Mixed 576 471% 667 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 216%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 5,417 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.2% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.7 66% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 19.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	259x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	128x
Quadro P5200NvidiaBench 80%, 527 samples	119x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	120x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	81x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	48x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	79x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	40x
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	28x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16