Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics 1,618 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 40 1-Core 13.7 2-Core 33.6 20% 29.1 Pts	4-Core 32.9 8-Core 34.7 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 34.4 2% 34.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B54) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.66 1% 2.01 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.48 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 111 117 116 129 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 375 Write 322 Mixed 140 SusWrite 135 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 7.1 39% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 74.2 DQ Write 55.8 DQ Mixed 26.1 30% 52 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 22%, 1,618 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	2x

SSD
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16