Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 40.9 1-Core 21.8 2-Core 49.1 24% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 76.7 8-Core 102 11% 89.3 Pts	64-Core 21.1 1% 21.1 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80% Very good	Lighting 98.5 Reflection 113 Parallax 107 80% 106 fps	MRender 97.7 Gravity 93.7 Splatting 99 80% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 224 320 47 64 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 452 Write 345 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 122 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 1.1 32% 9.37 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 23 DQ Mixed 1.1 20% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 102%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 411GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 102 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 106 Write 100 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 103 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 62%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 214GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 150 Write 138 Mixed 109 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 195% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EWB4GB681PAE-16IC YXS1866C10D3/8G EWB4GB681PAE-16IC YXS1866C10D3/8G 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 4.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16