Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Panasonic CF-30KCPAXAM (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF30-3
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090121
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '20 at 02:45
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo L9300 128 User benchmarks, average bench 33% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 37.5 28% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 37 8-Core 36.7 5% 36.8 Pts	64-Core 36.7 2% 36.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(10F7 8338) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 99 93 91 89 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.6% Poor	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 112 SusWrite 95.5 25% 110 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 11.4 46% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 72.1 DQ Write 70.8 DQ Mixed 51.7 44% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 40GB 7,939 User benchmarks, average bench 22% null MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16