Asus X555LNB

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555LNB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LNB
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Memory 29
1-Core 27
2-Core 52.9
22% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 78.8
8-Core 92.8
11% 85.8 Pts
64-Core 114
8% 114 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 237A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 8.53
9% 9.36 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 7.3
3% 5.62 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 86 101 99 56 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 318
Write 208
Mixed 246
SusWrite 94.4
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 18.5
70% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 15.8
46% 104 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 261
15% 261 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X555LNB Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 54%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $50
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback