=== * CPU Microcodes Updated

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System=== * CPU Microcodes Updated  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X79-ZD3
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 15:11
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 629
57% 480 Pts
64-Core 835
52% 835 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 112
Parallax 94.7
83% 103 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 96.3
Splatting 100
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1121 1062 1019 1014 980 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 867
Write 992
Mixed 834
SusWrite 1,064
212% 939 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 56
181% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 535
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 451
333% 443 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 176%
Great: 245%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
347GB free
Firmware: 1C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 72 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 68.9
Write 70.2
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 70.9
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 69%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 32GB
1GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 17 11 12 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 13.2
24% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 24%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 9.6 9.5 7.5 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Read 12
Write 6.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 8.7
9% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 33%
Patriot Supersonic Boost XT USB 3.0 16GB-$10
5GB free, PID 5100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 17.7
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 20.1
25% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A M393B5170GB0- 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 40.7
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback