Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 67.8 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 158 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 622 56% 473 Pts	64-Core 791 49% 791 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.5 31% 35 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 35.2 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB 30,033 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 858GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 1175 1173 1166 1161 1158 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 930 Write 1,160 Mixed 978 SusWrite 1,108 236% 1,044 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 48.6 157% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 599 DQ Write 427 DQ Mixed 548 400% 524 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 305%
Seagate ST3000NC000 3TB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2.5TB free Firmware: CE02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 200 200 201 200 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 188 Mixed 68 SusWrite 193 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.1 5.8 7.6 8.2 7.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 6.2 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 59% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 58GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 24.6 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	251x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16