Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '20 at 13:27
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 93.5 1-Core 131 2-Core 260 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 454 56% 430 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1127A SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 450 442 379 430 426 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 414 Mixed 339 SusWrite 415 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 26.4 143% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 33.9 70% 139 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 98%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 407GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 97 105 92 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 115 Write 95 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 100 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 458GB free Firmware: 3.CHN SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 75 73 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 77.1 Write 75.9 Mixed 48.6 SusWrite 73.9 51% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 12GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 9.6 9.6 9.9 11 9.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 109 Write 23.4 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 9.2 33% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 49% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 23.8 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 22.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,184x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	683x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	212x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	303x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	207x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	205x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	247x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	87x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	116x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16