Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	122.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '20 at 09:48
Run Duration	348 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$508 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 218 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 876 78% 660 Pts	64-Core 1,449 90% 1,449 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Lighting 85.9 Reflection 93.5 Parallax 80.7 70% 86.7 fps	MRender 89.6 Gravity 85.8 Splatting 93.4 74% 89.6 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 497GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2001 2015 2071 2043 2087 2113 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	322% Outstanding	Read 2,255 Write 1,953 Mixed 1,309 SusWrite 2,055 425% 1,893 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 73.4 227% 84.4 MB/s	DQ Read 858 DQ Write 726 DQ Mixed 793 594% 793 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 322% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB 260 User benchmarks, average bench 311% 493GB free Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2201 2168 1452 1456 1469 1469 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	319% Outstanding	Read 2,199 Write 2,069 Mixed 1664 SusWrite 1,702 429% 1,909 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 87.3 278% 99.5 MB/s	DQ Read 989 DQ Write 815 DQ Mixed 920 684% 908 MB/s
Poor: 226% ↑ This bench: 319% Great: 384%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2TB free Firmware: DN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 191 191 193 191 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 150 149 150 149 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$242 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 221 224 225 224 224 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 130 133 123 131 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 180 Write 191 Mixed 81 SusWrite 130 106% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 110%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 169 170 169 170 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 169 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 97%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free Firmware: LEGNT3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 139 133 135 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 222 Mixed 102 SusWrite 136 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.1 293% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 8x16GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 52.6 MC Write 50.9 MC Mixed 44.5 141% 49.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 20.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $784

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16