Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 144% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	48.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200828
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '20 at 00:00
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Memory 84.3 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1178 105% 888 Pts	64-Core 2,810 174% 2,810 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 4008) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 149 Parallax 159 127% 154 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 133 Splatting 108 112% 142 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,615 Write 2456 Mixed 1,884 516% 2,318 MB/s	4K Read 63.5 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 88.6 294% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,170 DQ Write 635 DQ Mixed 950 694% 918 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 100GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,407 Write 2,344 Mixed 1,629 473% 2,126 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 84.4 271% 94.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,262 DQ Write 829 DQ Mixed 944 731% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 14GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 491 Write 439 Mixed 376 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 54.6 178% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 201 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110 3,009 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 66GB free Firmware: R1311 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 393 414 408 407 381 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 419 Mixed 224 SusWrite 404 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 35.6 134% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 130 117% 178 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 5GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 104 Mixed 64.4 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 68GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 117 120 114 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 107 Write 41.7 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 117 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 72%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 287GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 119 120 117 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 129 129 128 131 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 127 Mixed 98.8 SusWrite 127 162% 118 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 1 320% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 99%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 155 152 150 158 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 225 Write 160 Mixed 132 SusWrite 154 216% 168 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 161% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 38.9 MC Mixed 39.3 117% 40.9 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 37.9 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 172%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,137x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	913x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	698x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $1,196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16