PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160818 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 14 '17 at 09:52 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
96.5%
Outstanding
|
||||
270%
Outstanding
|
||||
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
235%
Outstanding
|
|||
92.9%
Outstanding
|
||||
95.2%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3203 MHz
|
136%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 228x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 103x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 40x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 39x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $1,178 |