Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 09:52
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 140
61% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 828
72% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 30.9
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 47.4
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 43.3
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
739GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 406
Mixed 195
81% 368 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 33.9
138% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 98.3
106% 178 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
135GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,077
Write 1,422
Mixed 1,581
376% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 56.6
250% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 218
250% 440 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 270%
Great: 283%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,887
Write 991
Mixed 1,273
305% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 54.4
252% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 197
232% 415 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 235%
Great: 283%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 167
Mixed 119
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.3
128% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 159
Mixed 78.6
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.25
115% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3203 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 53.4
160% 56 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 136%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback