Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 00:21
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 133
57% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 371
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 53.7
51% 59.3 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 60.7
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 292 286 256 194 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 440
Write 308
Mixed 264
SusWrite 248
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 31.9
97% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 25
64% 139 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
829GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 186 184 186 188 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 175
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 184
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 5.3 5.1 5.4 5.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 4.6
7% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback