Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 157 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 366 39% 313 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.3% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 124 Parallax 123 94% 121 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 122 Splatting 102 86% 105 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 101%
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0685) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 2.84 3% 4.15 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.78 4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 360 311 311 314 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 463 Write 427 Mixed 359 SusWrite 334 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 36.4 114% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 304 238% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 401GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 87 86 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 84.6 Write 84.6 Mixed 31.4 SusWrite 85.7 52% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 57%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 348GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 71 71 72 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 66.2 Write 60.4 Mixed 26 SusWrite 70.9 74% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,168 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 18.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	604x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	58x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	56x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 44%, 3,343 samples	104x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,522 samples	51x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG NT2GC64B88G0NS-CG 6GBNanyaBench 39%, 388 samples	38x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16