Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive8.26% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 10:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 131
56% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 342
32% 269 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.1% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 109
Parallax 88.6
80% 98.4 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 98.3
78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 4 21 60 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.26% Terrible
Read 99.8
Write 116
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 26
14% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.9
8% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 8.26%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
612GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.3 6.8 35 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 72
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 36.3
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 61%
WD WD7500BPVT-80HXZT3 500GB
182GB free
Firmware: HA431DN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 59 57 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 61.3
Write 62.2
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 57.6
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0
128% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-570.A00LF 99U5403-072.A00LF 9905402-570.A00LF 99U5403-072.A00LF 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback