Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 140% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '20 at 02:19
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 66.8 1-Core 148 2-Core 299 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1,163 104% 878 Pts	64-Core 2,769 171% 2,769 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 162 Parallax 169 136% 166 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 147 Splatting 110 115% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 15,656 User benchmarks, average bench 339% 689GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 782 769 789 871 870 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,714 Write 3,006 Mixed 1,315 SusWrite 876 390% 1,728 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 43.1 155% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 454 DQ Mixed 555 412% 549 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 491%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 9,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 245GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 123 124 122 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 122 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 1.6 350% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 138%
FCR-HS3 -0 1GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6348 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8.5 Write 7.8 Mixed 7.7 10% 8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 15% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB 5,167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 24.1 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 22.3 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	311x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,528

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16