Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y51 484 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 59.4 33% 49 Pts	4-Core 91.5 8-Core 103 13% 97.4 Pts	64-Core 106 7% 106 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2009) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 2.66 0% 2.15 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.63 Splatting 5.83 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB 4,074 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 250 255 256 253 255 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 417 Write 392 Mixed 229 SusWrite 256 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 24.5 84% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 206 163% 229 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 746448-982 2x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.6% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	2x
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	1x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	3x

SSD
L8T-128L6G-HP 128GBLiteonitBench 74%, 473 samples	2x
SD7SN3Q-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 76%, 204 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16