Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '20 at 10:26
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 79.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 232 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 830 78% 646 Pts	64-Core 825 51% 825 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 159 Parallax 143 118% 149 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 145 Splatting 106 96% 118 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 489 486 482 482 483 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 2245 Write 2,036 Mixed 1,443 SusWrite 535 349% 1,565 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 52.3 182% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 842 DQ Write 780 DQ Mixed 811 609% 811 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 123GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 298 299 314 314 315 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 435 Mixed 385 SusWrite 318 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 49.5 164% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 352 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 151GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 435 427 426 422 418 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 463 Mixed 362 SusWrite 430 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 44.6 138% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 246 214% 318 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 446 Write 427 Mixed 362 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 49.2 161% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 351 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 209GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 131 130 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 126 Write 119 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 130 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 248GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 91.9 Write 59.5 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 92.3 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 295GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 91.1 Write 87.4 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 63.3 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 9.5 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.4 122% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 13%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 258GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 37.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 37.6 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.7 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,431x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,358x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,796x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,209x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,165x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	917x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,025x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	795x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	632x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	500x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	490x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	437x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,077

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16