Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 274
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,080
96% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,718
106% 1,718 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 117
Parallax 98
89% 108 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 103
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Svbus Virtual Hard Disk SCSI RAM Device 4GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4,034
Write 8,503
Mixed 4373
1,274% 5,637 MB/s
4K Read 508
4K Write 478
4K Mixed 489
1,649% 492 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 1,135
DQ Mixed 1,117
847% 1,137 MB/s
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB
13GB free
Firmware: K3110310
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,278
Write 284
Mixed 465
146% 676 MB/s
4K Read 293
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 204
787% 217 MB/s
DQ Read 1,310
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 434
411% 672 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 328%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB
458GB free
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1595 1594 1597 1597 1598 319 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,815
Write 1,597
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 1,383
405% 1,821 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 92.5
319% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,319
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,458
1,004% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 347%
Great: 330%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
356GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 469 471 471 472 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 471
Mixed 436
SusWrite 470
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 56.4
186% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 306
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 912GB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 755 342 255 182 408 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 417
Write 171
Mixed 430
SusWrite 449
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 40.5
162% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 302
242% 336 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 146%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
140GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 767 860 845 899 862 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 907
Mixed 619
SusWrite 851
193% 862 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63
215% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 403
310% 420 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 181%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 31.1
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 9.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $775
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback