PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7599 |
Motherboard | MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100423 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 07 '20 at 19:22 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 159 159 160 153 155 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
192GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 167 168 169 168 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
19GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 74 77 74 63 61 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
35%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 14x |
Athlon II X3 425AMDBench 42%, 1,367 samples | 5x |
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples | 4x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 4x |
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $621 |