Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150904
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 41.3 2-Core 111 44% 72.6 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 136 22% 158 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.6% Very good	Lighting 87.7 Reflection 108 Parallax 100 71% 98.5 fps	MRender 93.5 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 97.8 78% 94.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 28 29 29 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 176GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 51 58 56 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 27 Write 21 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 54.4 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 62%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 119GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 22 17 16 16 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 24.9 Write 14.7 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 17.4 23% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.4 90% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.2% Average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 17.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 7.8 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	49x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	30x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	5x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	5x
99U5471-039.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 1,536 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16