HP SN253UP#ABA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP SN253UP#ABA (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '20 at 18:11
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 325 45% 332 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1494) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.15 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 71 99 104 103 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 125 Write 127 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 94.1 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 9.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 20.4 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 10.3 16% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.7 524% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 958GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 21 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 9.8 15% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 238% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.8 9.8 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 19.4 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 10.1 15% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 189% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 959GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.1 7.3 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.89% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 19 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 7.2 14% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.89% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.4 7.3 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 20.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 7.2 14% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.5 181% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 94%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB 3,377 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 314GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.9 7 7 6.9 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.86% Terrible	Read 29.2 Write 18.4 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 6.9 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 50% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 959GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7.1 7 6.9 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 28.9 Write 18.7 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 7 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.2 202% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 976GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 7 7 6.9 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 29.2 Write 18.2 Mixed 22 SusWrite 7 24% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.1 199% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ATECH4GPC31600U Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 ATECH4GPC31600U ATECH4GPC31600U 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.9% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16