Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 17:54
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 155
2-Core 312
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,231
109% 926 Pts
64-Core 2,314
143% 2,314 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 35.6
24% 32.3 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 31.3
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 490 493 500 493 502 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,217
Write 2,411
Mixed 1,916
SusWrite 546
397% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 73.6
228% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1336
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 13.1
233% 583 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 232%
Great: 374%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
105GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 46 60 61 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 211
Write 77.6
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 57.5
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 20.2
74% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 88.7
71% 102 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 49%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
167GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 69 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 81.2
Mixed 62
SusWrite 66.6
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 62%
WD WD1500AHFD-00RAR5 150GB
105GB free
Firmware: 20.07P20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 81 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 78.8
Write 77.7
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 81.6
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$96
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 51.4
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 40
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 123%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback