| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160531 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 05 '20 at 12:56 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.6%
Good
|
59% 95.2 Pts
|
32% 252 Pts
|
18% 287 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.1%
Below average
|
24% 48.9 fps
|
51% 63 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
94% 422 MB/s
|
158% 52.7 MB/s
|
112% 187 MB/s
| |
|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
235GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 331 329 335 332 307 MB/s
|
68.5%
Good
|
75% 332 MB/s
|
102% 34.9 MB/s
|
40% 55.9 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
70GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 78 77 81 81 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
46% 63 MB/s
|
166% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
78GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
22.7%
Poor
|
30% 40.9 MB/s
|
123% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1866C11D3L/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C11D3L/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
30% 10.7 GB/s
|
55% 73.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |