Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '20 at 23:46
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon W3680-$400
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 218
82% 139 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 644
69% 537 Pts
64-Core 787
53% 787 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Gigabyte(1458 4040) ≥ 4GB; GV-N3080EAGLE OC-10GD
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4900 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 206
Parallax 306
138% 228 fps
MRender 301
Gravity 239
Splatting 147
200% 229 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 167%
Great: 230%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 64 64 46 65 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 116
Write 117
Mixed 104
SusWrite 59.4
22% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 15.1
69% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 29.9
24% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 115%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$120
579GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 1211 1239 1242 1254 1258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 1,304
Mixed 1259
SusWrite 1,228
288% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 51.9
169% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 575
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 490
358% 473 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 202%
Great: 334%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$70
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 65 47 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 61.8
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$70
755GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 126 127 125 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 121
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 125
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 112 114 109 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 124
Write 86.8
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 110
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 1TB
294GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 86.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 75.3
101% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 20.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 4,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $240Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback