Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 48.4 22% 35 Pts	4-Core 39.6 8-Core 26.8 5% 33.2 Pts	64-Core 10.8 1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 366GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0C1C SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 72 76 74 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 53.5 Write 51.9 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 70.9 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 60%
USB Flash DISK 32GB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.7 2.4 4.2 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.19% Terrible	Read 20 Write 3.3 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 4.1 10% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.2 47% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GB 928 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	185x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	23x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	208x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GBAdataBench 22%, 928 samples	96x
HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 16%, 5,684 samples	55x
HP16D3LS1KEGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 17%, 468 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16