MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A57
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 276
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 731
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 186
Parallax 179
138% 178 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 167
Splatting 122
110% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,951
Write 841
Mixed 579
244% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 45
206% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 537
496% 759 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 486
Mixed 399
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 61.5
214% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
89GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 479 478 487 489 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 486
Mixed 406
SusWrite 482
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.2
217% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 133%
Great: 132%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
95GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2607
Write 2,417
Mixed 1,945
517% 2,323 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 95.9
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,514
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,426
1,078% 1,445 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
250GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 131 136 146 115 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 495
Write 166
Mixed 174
SusWrite 130
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 29.3
131% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 173
148% 223 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 122%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB
457GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.3% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 41.2
9% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 15.2
48% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 24.8
19% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) Builds (Compare 1,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback