Asus M4A785-M

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A785-M (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '20 at 22:53
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 88.4 45% 69.9 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 245 25% 203 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.6% Outstanding	Lighting 103 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 170 84% 100 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 173 Splatting 120 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 545GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 275 265 276 277 279 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 339 Write 297 Mixed 281 SusWrite 273 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 47.7 156% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 46.9 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 64.2 54% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 102GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 193 198 199 199 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.8% Good	Read 223 Write 202 Mixed 196 SusWrite 195 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 40.1 130% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 37.1 DQ Write 66 DQ Mixed 47 37% 50 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.4% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A785-M Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785-M

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	9x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	6x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
360GB 360GBSSDBench 57%, 1,295 samples	3x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	3x
Ultra Plus 128GBSanDisk $75Bench 77%, 16,709 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16