Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	14.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '17 at 18:11
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 55.3 2-Core 110 56% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 204 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8520) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 44.2 Parallax 40.2 37% 43.3 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 36.4 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 17835851 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 18 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 135351599374658 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2703 (AB) Unknown 0 0 9 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2021 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 9 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 66 34364063769 (C2) HDA temperature 25 66 34364063769 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 17835851 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 18 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 17835851 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 17835851 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14623 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11291 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11291 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10972	35% Below average	Read 150 Write 89.7 Mixed 91.8 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 7.77 75% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 7.59 19% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 113GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 152 147 5400 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3245 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15616 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5604 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 654 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5604 (C2) HDA temperature 108 98 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.6% Below average	Read 59 Write 75 Mixed 68.6 51% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.38 111% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149 6,960 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 82GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 95 216835827 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9318 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 45 919622279249 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17463 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6062 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 639696934 (C2) HDA temperature 38 50 51539607590 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 60 89926039 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	39.6% Below average	Read 71.6 Write 66.1 Mixed 14.3 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.29 94% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 43%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 42GB free Firmware: 12.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 156 5000 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11386 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18323 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5972 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1091 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11390 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1296 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.1% Average	Read 66.5 Write 72.6 Mixed 38.1 44% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.31 4K Mixed 0.39 112% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C7 4x2GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 800 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.2% Below average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 14.5 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.5 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 350 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1333 Team-Elite-1333 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 48 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16