Lenovo 80ST

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80ST (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '20 at 21:37
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR) 5,770 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 22.6 1-Core 41.7 2-Core 65.2 24% 43.2 Pts	4-Core 89.9 8-Core 110 13% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3809) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 7.72 4% 6.68 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 4.48 4% 4.26 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 12,305 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 188 196 180 216 196 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 340 Write 201 Mixed 160 SusWrite 189 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 17.2 56% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 101 85% 124 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 105%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1 1TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 882GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 88 84 97 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 79 Write 95.2 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 88.9 96% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ 12GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1200, 1200 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.82% Terrible	MC Read 0.5 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4.1 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 302 13% 302 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80ST Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80ST

CPU
A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 33%, 13,243 samples	62x
A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 34%, 5,770 samples	47x
FX-9800P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 36%, 3,040 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	62x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	51x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x

RAM
RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 12GBRamaxelBench 22%, 358 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 467 samples	20x
M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 321 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16